RI/MA Offshore Wind Developers
Use the links below to get access to resources and learn more about each of the projects in the RI/MA wind energy area (WEA)
Fishing Industry Concerns
1. Industry believes that there is political pressure on BOEM to develop Offshore Wind quickly. There are concerns that BOEM will issue permits based on currently available information that will become inadequate and out-of-date once construction begins.
2. From a strictly operational viewpoint, placing turbines close to shore would lower construction cost, reduce maintenance and power transmission cost, as well as reduce impacts to fishermen. However, landowners do not want to look at turbines in the sea. Leasing areas of historical fishing grounds for the purposes of offshore wind development will displace fishermen and force them to be the primary interest group and “collateral damage” as the US moves to develop offshore wind.
3. The fishing industry has expressed concern that the tradition of fishing, which is important to N.E.’s cultural heritage, is being lost. Although wind development is not the major contributor to the decline in fishing, it is yet another “nail in the coffin” for this industry. Thus, making it extremely difficult to maintain a healthy fishery.
4. The Industry is deeply concerned that the overall impacts of offshore wind will be negative for fishermen and the ecosystems they rely on. These impacts cannot be predicted with a level of confidence that fishermen will be able to survive.
5. The uncertainty about the impacts of wind energy development is a major reason why the industry is opposed to it. Before fishermen endorse wind development, they want a complete understanding and sound science of the impacts on; fish survival and behavior, habitats fish rely on to survive, safety and navigation, social and economic impacts to fisheries and the ports they rely on, and the cumulative impacts of multiple development projects in a short time frame. In their view, the data is inaccurate, inconclusive, not collected correctly, nor collected on a sufficiently fine scale to be useful in determining impacts.
6. The industry is frustrated that wind development is being forced upon them at an inconvenient time, after fishermen have been constrained over the past two decades to rebuild fish stocks. Now that the sacrifices are beginning to bear fruit, the industry is concerned that they will have to accept further constraints due to construction and operations of the wind turbines. Not to mention, potential of causing irreparable harm to the rebuilt stocks, causing a fish stock decline and economic hardship.
7. Industry is concerned that wind farms could become de facto marine protected areas, from which fishing is excluded. If a serious accident were to occur, causing loss of life, property and or major damage to a wind turbine, there may be a risk that all fishing will be prohibited by the Fed. Gov’t or the marine insurers for safety precautions, thus further displacing fishermen.
8. There is a major lack of involvement of industry members in the planning process, particularly the ability to influence the final decisions on wind farm construction, turbine layout and operations. This has caused a lack of engagement by the industry; the feeling is we met with the industry (check the box) but no one is interested or listening. For a true collaboration, fishermen need to be an integral part of the planning and decision-making process, not just occasional advisors. An appropriate quote, “If you’re not at the table, you are on the Menu.”
9. Major long-term research is paramount and should be funded collectively by all Wind Farm Developers, with the funds managed by a Non-Profit Foundation with a history of working collaboratively with Academia, NEFSC and Fishing Industry. Forming a working group of academia, scientists, managers, and stakeholders to set research priorities is necessary. Research must commence pre-construction to assess baseline of fish stocks, during construction and monitoring phases, and long-term phases of 15 years or more to measure impacts and form mitigation strategies.
10. In recent years, fishermen have observed that the geotechnical and geophysical surveys conducted by the multiple developers negatively impact their catches. During and after the geotechnical and geophysical surveys take place in an area, fishermen’s catches are greatly reduced. Because of this, the industry feels it is imperative that baseline studies need to take place prior to any geotechnical and geophysical survey work to get a true and accurate assessment of the impacts.
11. It is important to establish a collaborative plan for damage to fishing gear and power cables, with an appropriate protocol for proof of damage, cost, down time, etc. utilizing a knowledgeable fishing industry representative and wind developer liaison to determine fair mitigation.
12. Additional Industry concerns; loss of fishing grounds during construction, acoustical noise ring impact from pile driving on specific fish species and their larvae, Electromagnetic Fields and Low Frequency Noise of Fish Stocks, Scouring around the base of the mono-pilings, contaminated dredge spoils from pile driving, suspended sediment settling impacts /benthic/ shellfish, burying of transmission cables, timing of construction, spacing of turbines for mobile gear to fish and transit lanes to and from traditional fishing grounds, safety concerns, radar double imaging and spoking, additional cost of conducting business, communications, and decommissioning.
2. From a strictly operational viewpoint, placing turbines close to shore would lower construction cost, reduce maintenance and power transmission cost, as well as reduce impacts to fishermen. However, landowners do not want to look at turbines in the sea. Leasing areas of historical fishing grounds for the purposes of offshore wind development will displace fishermen and force them to be the primary interest group and “collateral damage” as the US moves to develop offshore wind.
3. The fishing industry has expressed concern that the tradition of fishing, which is important to N.E.’s cultural heritage, is being lost. Although wind development is not the major contributor to the decline in fishing, it is yet another “nail in the coffin” for this industry. Thus, making it extremely difficult to maintain a healthy fishery.
4. The Industry is deeply concerned that the overall impacts of offshore wind will be negative for fishermen and the ecosystems they rely on. These impacts cannot be predicted with a level of confidence that fishermen will be able to survive.
5. The uncertainty about the impacts of wind energy development is a major reason why the industry is opposed to it. Before fishermen endorse wind development, they want a complete understanding and sound science of the impacts on; fish survival and behavior, habitats fish rely on to survive, safety and navigation, social and economic impacts to fisheries and the ports they rely on, and the cumulative impacts of multiple development projects in a short time frame. In their view, the data is inaccurate, inconclusive, not collected correctly, nor collected on a sufficiently fine scale to be useful in determining impacts.
6. The industry is frustrated that wind development is being forced upon them at an inconvenient time, after fishermen have been constrained over the past two decades to rebuild fish stocks. Now that the sacrifices are beginning to bear fruit, the industry is concerned that they will have to accept further constraints due to construction and operations of the wind turbines. Not to mention, potential of causing irreparable harm to the rebuilt stocks, causing a fish stock decline and economic hardship.
7. Industry is concerned that wind farms could become de facto marine protected areas, from which fishing is excluded. If a serious accident were to occur, causing loss of life, property and or major damage to a wind turbine, there may be a risk that all fishing will be prohibited by the Fed. Gov’t or the marine insurers for safety precautions, thus further displacing fishermen.
8. There is a major lack of involvement of industry members in the planning process, particularly the ability to influence the final decisions on wind farm construction, turbine layout and operations. This has caused a lack of engagement by the industry; the feeling is we met with the industry (check the box) but no one is interested or listening. For a true collaboration, fishermen need to be an integral part of the planning and decision-making process, not just occasional advisors. An appropriate quote, “If you’re not at the table, you are on the Menu.”
9. Major long-term research is paramount and should be funded collectively by all Wind Farm Developers, with the funds managed by a Non-Profit Foundation with a history of working collaboratively with Academia, NEFSC and Fishing Industry. Forming a working group of academia, scientists, managers, and stakeholders to set research priorities is necessary. Research must commence pre-construction to assess baseline of fish stocks, during construction and monitoring phases, and long-term phases of 15 years or more to measure impacts and form mitigation strategies.
10. In recent years, fishermen have observed that the geotechnical and geophysical surveys conducted by the multiple developers negatively impact their catches. During and after the geotechnical and geophysical surveys take place in an area, fishermen’s catches are greatly reduced. Because of this, the industry feels it is imperative that baseline studies need to take place prior to any geotechnical and geophysical survey work to get a true and accurate assessment of the impacts.
11. It is important to establish a collaborative plan for damage to fishing gear and power cables, with an appropriate protocol for proof of damage, cost, down time, etc. utilizing a knowledgeable fishing industry representative and wind developer liaison to determine fair mitigation.
12. Additional Industry concerns; loss of fishing grounds during construction, acoustical noise ring impact from pile driving on specific fish species and their larvae, Electromagnetic Fields and Low Frequency Noise of Fish Stocks, Scouring around the base of the mono-pilings, contaminated dredge spoils from pile driving, suspended sediment settling impacts /benthic/ shellfish, burying of transmission cables, timing of construction, spacing of turbines for mobile gear to fish and transit lanes to and from traditional fishing grounds, safety concerns, radar double imaging and spoking, additional cost of conducting business, communications, and decommissioning.
WATERFRONT APP
WATERFRONT is a free and easy to use mobile application that gives full visibility of marine information, ensuring better situational awareness on the water. It enables direct and secure communication with marine stakeholders – allowing you to grow your marine network. WATERFRONT empowers fishermen by giving them the full picture of what is happening in their marine backyard. If you want to have streamlined up-to-date offshore wind activity notifications on a live map, overlayed with AIS traffic, nautical charts, LORAN lines and more; then WATERFRONT is for you. If you want to be able to engage directly with ocean users, including offshore wind developers and other fishermen, with full autonomy and privacy; then WATERFRONT is for you. If you want to have control of your marine data for your benefit; then WATERFRONT is for you. WATERFRONT has a new interactive web app design that revitalizes your experience, making it easier than ever to get relevant information about your whereabouts in no time! Sign in to the new WATERFRONT web app for free using the link above to get information about activities in your marine backyard on your personal tablet, computer, or VMS. Notifications are real-time, streamlined, and customized to your preferences. Get free AIS data, chat with your marine friends, engage directly with marine projects, and
control your data all from one place.
control your data all from one place.
